Rima International Journal of Education (RIJE)

ISSN: 2756 – 6749(print); 3141-2033(online)

Rima International Journal of Education (RIJE)

Predictors of Higher-Order Thinking Skills among Postgraduate Students of Sokoto State University, Sokoto State, Nigeria

*1Ahmad Tijani Surajudeen ad 2A.H. Folorunsho

*1Department of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education, Sokoto State University (SSU), Sokoto, -Nigeria. Email: sirajudeenoloje1@gmail.com

2Department of Islamic Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Email: folorunsho.ah@unilorin.edu.ng

Cite this as: Surajudeen, A. T., & Folorunsho, A. H. (2026). Predictors of Higher-Order Thinking Skills among Postgraduate Students of Sokoto State University, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Rima International Journal of Education, 5(2), 133—158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65760/rijessu.v5.2.10

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prediction of higher-order thinking (HOTS) skills among postgraduate students at Sokoto State University, Nigeria, based on cognitive dispositions, innovation capacity, research competencies, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. The current study is underpinned by Bloom’s Taxonomy and the constructivist learning theory, which emphasize the significance of cognitive and analytical skills in promoting higher-order thinking. A quantitative research design was employed to investigate the prediction of higher-order thinking skills, and structured questionnaires were used to obtain data from 250 randomly selected postgraduate students from various faculties across the university. Multiple regression and correlation analysis were employed to analyze the collected data. The findings revealed that all the independent variables significantly and positively predicted higher-order thinking skills, and critical thinking and research competencies significantly predicted higher-order thinking skills more than the other independent variables. Cognitive dispositions and innovation capacity also significantly predicted higher-order thinking skills, while problem-solving skills served as a mediating factor in predicting higher-order cognitive performance based on critical thinking skills. The findings of the current study emphasize the need to integrate higher-order research skills, innovation, and problem-solving skills in promoting higher-order thinking skills among postgraduate students. The findings suggest that promoting higher-order thinking skills is crucial in equipping Nigerian graduates with intellectual and cognitive capacities to contribute to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Nigeria, specifically in quality education (SDG 4), innovation and infrastructure (SDG 9), and sustainable institutions (SDG 16).

Keywords

Cognitive Dispositions, Innovation Capacity, Research Competencies, Critical Thinking, Problem-Solving Skills and Higher-Order Thinking

Reference

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and       assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Aydin, F., & Aybek, B. (2024). University students’ cognitive flexibility and critical thinking      dispositions: The mediating role of need for cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity,             42, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.101115.

Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2022). Individual-level factors are significantly more predictive        of innovative output than contextual factors. Personality and Social Psychology           Bulletin, 48(6), 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221074565.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dyer, J. et al. , Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2009). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five          skills of disruptive             innovators. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60–67.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184.          https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics          International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Facione, P. A., & Gittens, C. A. (2015). Mapping decisions and arguments. Inquiry: Critical        Thinking Across the Disciplines, 30(2), 17-53.

Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1994). The California critical thinking            disposition inventory. Academic Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

García, R., & Calantone, R. J. (2024). Innovation capabilities and their dimensions: A       systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113800.          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113800.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.).       Psychology Press.

Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-  solving learning environments. Routledge.

Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2025). Critical thinking disposition as a mediator in creativity and     problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101356.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.        https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2011). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in     support of information systems research. Informing Science: International Journal of          an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, 181–212. https://doi.org/10.28945/418

McGuire, T., & Johnstone, M. (2023). Enabling critical thinking development in higher    education through dialogic teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 765–780.          https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1918665.

Mumford, M. D., et al. (2012). Construct validity of performance measures of creative problem   solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 77–88.

Rocha, W. L. L., Almeida, M. F. L., & Calili, R. F. (2023). Measuring and evaluating       organizational innovation capacity and performance from a systemic and sustainability- oriented perspective. Sustainability, 15(1), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010682.

Şahin, A., & Yıldırım, F. (2023). The mediating role of critical thinking dispositions between      self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in university students. Thinking Skills and      Creativity, 40, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.101002.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal     of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2016). Conceptualizing innovation in higher education. The        Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 1–23.       https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1178083

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.       Harvard University Press.

Walsh, C., Quinn, K., Wieman, C., & Holmes, N. G. (2019). The Physics Lab Inventory of          Critical Thinking (PLIC): A tool for measuring critical thinking in physics labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010121

Wei, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Relationship between thinking dispositions, working memory, and   reasoning ability among university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1342678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342678.

Yusuf, A., & Alabi, T. (2020). Cognitive dispositions and academic persistence among     postgraduate students in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and          Practice, 10(2), 45–58.

Zhang, H., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). How to enhance the innovation capacity of technology-      based enterprises: A knowledge management perspective. Technovation, 126, 102676.          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102676.