The Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Simulations and Virtual Labs in Improving Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in Biology Education
*1Muhammad Hayatu Yusuf, 2Muinat Mahmoud Ibrahim, 3Baraka Sarki Ibrahim, and 4Bunmi Mercy Alafiatyo
*1Department of Science Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria Email: hyusuf657@gmail.com
2,3&4Federal University of Education, Zaria, Email: muinat.im@gmail.com2, barakasarki@gmail.com3, bumercyalafiatayo@gmail.com4
Abstract
This research examined how technology-based simulations and virtual laboratories influence students’ understanding of complex biological concepts and their development of science process skills (SPS). The study was anchored on the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory, and the ICAP framework, and employed a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design. A sample of 160 senior secondary school students, drawn from five purposively selected schools, took part. Intact classes were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (simulation/virtual lab) or the control group (traditional lecture). Data were gathered using the Biology Conceptual Understanding Test (BCUT) and the Science Process Skills Rubric (SPSR), both of which were validated and shown to be reliable. Findings revealed that while both groups improved after instruction, the experimental group achieved significantly higher gains in conceptual understanding (M = 79.38, SD = 5.74) compared with the control group (M = 64.26, SD = 7.15), t(298) = 12.82, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.49. Further ANCOVA results showed a significant effect of instructional method on SPS acquisition, F(1,296) = 82.64, p < 0.001, Partial Eta² = 0.218, indicating a strong advantage of simulations in promoting inquiry-related skills. Overall, the study demonstrates that technology-enhanced environments support deeper conceptual understanding and stronger scientific skills than conventional methods. It concludes that virtual laboratories and simulations serve as effective alternatives or supplements to traditional teaching, especially where access to physical labs is limited. The study recommends embedding these tools into biology curricula and providing teachers with relevant professional training to maximize student learning.
Keywords
Biology education, Conceptual understanding, Science process skills, Virtual laboratories, Simulations
Reference
Abdelhameed,
H., & Yahia, A. (2024). Teacher readiness and challenges in integrating
virtual laboratories into science classrooms. International Journal of
Science Education, 46(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2234567
Al-Ansi,
A., Ali, N., & Hussein, M. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning in science
education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Education and
Information Technologies, 28(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11322-1
Assefa,
E. A. (2024). Are co-curricular activities useful for diversity management?
Evidence from secondary schools in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Advances in Social
Sciences and Management, 2(3), 26–47. Retrieved from
https://hspublishing.org/ASSM/article/view/396.
Baudin,
C., Roussel, F., & Meyer, J. (2022). Remote and virtual laboratories in
biology education: Expanding access to authentic science practices. Journal
of Biological Education, 56(4), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1916405
Chang,
C. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Wu, H. K., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2022). Augmented reality
and virtual reality applications in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Educational
Research Review, 36, 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100459
Chengere,
M., Oduro, R., & Koomson, D. (2025). Enhancing science process skills
through guided inquiry laboratory instruction: Evidence from secondary school
biology. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences,
21(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v21i1.5
Chi,
M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive
engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4),
219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Jiang,
Y., Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2024). Effects of interactive simulations on
students’ learning outcomes in secondary biology education. Computers &
Education, 203, 104853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104853
Klymkowsky,
M. W., Underwood, S. M., & Garvin-Doxas, R. K. (2010). Thinking about the
conceptual foundations of the biological sciences. CBE—Life Sciences
Education, 9(4), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0061.
Koç,
M., & Ata, A. (2025). Debriefing and scaffolding strategies in virtual
labs: Implications for biology education. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 34(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10056-7
Kolb,
D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning
and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Mayer,
R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer,
R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Rodríguez-Hernández,
C. F., Jiménez, A., & Pérez, A. (2022). Virtual laboratories in science
education: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation challenges. Journal
of Science Education Research, 29(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10012-9
Rojas-Sánchez,
M. A., García, M., & Torres, A. (2023). The role of simulation-based
learning in improving science outcomes: A systematic review. Interactive
Learning Environments, 31(5), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2071598
Santhosh,
S., Raman, R., & Gopal, R. (2024). Student-centered approaches in biology
education: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10345-4
Vekli,
G. S., & Çalik, M. (2023). The impact of simulation-supported instruction
on conceptual change in biology: A meta-analysis. Research in Science
Education, 53(2), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10054-9
Yang,
X., Zhao, L., & Liu, H. (2024). The effectiveness of virtual reality on
STEM learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 55(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13265