Evaluating the Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain Activities on Students' Critical Thinking in Acid-Base Reactions at Sokoto Technical Schools
*1Hassan Aliyu and 2Mustapha Aliyu
Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Sokoto State University, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Email: nagoronyo@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-3126
Abstract
Critical thinking distinguishes students who genuinely understand chemistry from those who merely memorize facts, yet most instructional approaches fail to cultivate analytical skills in technical education contexts. Here we address the missing evidence on whether structured prediction-observation sequences can systematically build critical thinking capacities in acid-base chemistry. In a quasi-experimental study with 147 Nigerian technical college students, we demonstrate that Predict-Observe-Explain activities produce significantly larger gains in critical thinking compared to conventional instruction. Students in the POE group improved from 11.57 (SD = 3.31) to 20.92 (SD = 3.69) on a 75-point assessment, while controls improved from 11.73 (SD = 3.24) to only 15.82 (SD = 3.18). The group difference at posttest was statistically significant (p < .001) with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.24). Low achievers derived the greatest benefit, gaining 5.67 points more than their control group counterparts. Quality of POE engagement strongly predicted practical problem-solving performance (partial r = .59, p < .001) after controlling for prior ability. These findings establish that critical thinking can be systematically taught through cognitive conflict generated by prediction-observation discrepancies. For technical schools preparing students for laboratory careers, this work provides an accessible, resource-appropriate strategy for developing the analytical competence that industry demands.
Keywords: Predict-Observe-Explain; critical thinking; acid-base chemistry; technical education; cognitive conflict
Reference
Ajayi, V. O. (2025). Effect of Collaborative-Predict-Explain-Observe-Explain (CPEOE) instructional package on students’ learning outcomes in chemistry in secondary schools in Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 9(1), 45-62.
Ajayi, V. O., Ameh, P. O., & Negedu, S. A. (2025). Technology-supported constructivist model for pre-service chemistry teachers’ teaching quality and students’ learning outcomes in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 36(2), 112-134.
American Chemical Society. (2018). ACS guidelines for assessing analytical reasoning in chemistry education. American Chemical Society, Division of Chemical Education.
Bennett, J., & Kennedy, D. (2021). Assessment of practical skills in chemistry: A framework for authentic evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100-118.
Cetin-Dindar, A., Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2022). The effect of POE activities on students’ conceptual understanding and retention in acid-base chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(3), 567-582.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction—The Delphi report. The California Academic Press.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 117-124.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
Haryanti, A., Suwono, H., & Ibrahim, I. (2024). The POE2WE learning model: Enhancing critical thinking skills in chemistry for Indonesian secondary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 78-95.
Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain technique in probing students’ understanding about acid-base chemistry: A case for the concept of pH and pOH. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 575-586.
Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Abdullah, M. N. S. (2020). Enhancing primary school students’ critical thinking skills through inquiry-based chemistry learning. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 1821-1841.
Lia, R. M., Siahaan, P., & Haris, V. (2025). Implementation of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) learning model to improve students’ learning outcomes and activeness in acid-base titration material. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 20(1), 112-118.
Okonkwo, C. A., & Adebayo, S. A. (2023). Critical thinking deficits in first-year chemistry students across sub-Saharan Africa: A diagnostic assessment. African Journal of Chemical Education, 13(2), 45-62.
Olateju, T. T., Salami, I. A., & Ogunleye, A. O. (2023). Instructional practices in Nigerian technical colleges: A survey of chemistry teachers’ pedagogical approaches. Nigerian Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 78-94.
Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., & Faustine, S. (2021). Developing students’ critical thinking skills through integration of socio-scientific issues in POE-based chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 012-028.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Slisko, J., & Cruz, A. C. (2013). Helping students to recognize and correct their wrong ideas: The role of POE activities in developing assumption-awareness. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(3), 35-48.
Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Duit, R. (2021). POE in chemistry education: A review of research on conceptual change through prediction-observation sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1245-1268.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. Falmer Press.
Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2022). Investigating the quality of students’ explanations during POE activities in acid-base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(2), 189-208.
Yaman, F., Ayas, A., & Çalık, M. (2019). Facilitating conceptual change in acid-base chemistry through POE activities supported by animated movies. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 589-603.
Zahronada, A., Cahyono, E., & Sumarti, S. S. (2025). The effectiveness of POE learning model with hands-on activities on students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 221-238.